Movies Are Not Puzzle Boxes
Art is not a game or a problem to be solved, so there is no definitive “answer” to any artistic question. Movies, as a form of art, are subjective and open to interpretation. The best art leaves room for multiple interpretations and encourages viewers to explore different ideas and concepts. One such movie that achieves this is “Annihilation,” directed by Alex Garland.
A Disturbing Tale
“Annihilation” is a science fiction film that surprises and disturbs its viewers by taking them on an unexpected journey. Unlike typical sci-fi action movies, this film intentionally deviates from the expected narrative, which can both captivate and frustrate certain spectators.
Scenes such as Tessa Thompson growing leaves and individuals being attacked by a bear with human screams are both horrifying and distinctive in their horror. However, the majority of “Annihilation” takes place in the realm of metaphor. It aims to immerse viewers in the same dreamlike state as the characters, presenting ideas without explicitly stating them. This approach allows for a more profound and thought-provoking experience.
The Metaphor of Cancer
So, what exactly is the underlying meaning of “Annihilation”? The film metaphorically explores the theme of cancer. Although the movie never explicitly states this, it becomes evident early on that the central question driving the narrative is, “What if the Earth itself had cancer?”
The story follows Lena, a biologist played by Natalie Portman, who ventures into an enigmatic phenomenon called “The Shimmer” with four other scientists. Throughout their expedition, they encounter mutations and transformations caused by the cancer-like tumor at the core of The Shimmer.
Director Alex Garland cleverly uses this biological phenomenon as a metaphor for cancer’s impact on the human body. Just as cancer disrupts and mutates healthy cells, The Shimmer wreaks havoc on everything it touches.
A Subtle Approach
Unlike films that rely on shock value and lack explanations, “Annihilation” maintains a deliberate and nuanced narrative. Garland chooses not to depict everything as repugnant or morally disturbing. Instead, he presents a mix of beauty and horror, mirroring the way life itself evolves and changes over time.
Various elements in the film support the cancer metaphor, such as the fact that the expedition crew is composed entirely of women. This choice reflects the higher prevalence of breast cancer in women. Additionally, the character Dr. Ventress, played by Jennifer Jason Leigh, embodies the experience of an oncologist with a high patient mortality rate.
The Search for Redemption
At its core, “Annihilation” revolves around Lena’s personal journey and her search for redemption. Her relationship with her husband and her guilt over infidelity drive her actions and motivations throughout the film.
The movie does not explicitly focus on love but emphasizes Lena’s sense of indebtedness and obligation to her husband. This emotional center highlights the humanity and vulnerability of each character, ultimately connecting them to the overarching theme of the film.
Avoiding a Singular Interpretation
Garland deliberately avoids a single interpretation of cancer and death in “Annihilation.” Instead, he presents a complex and ever-evolving narrative. The mutations and transformations depicted in the film mirror the unpredictable and varied nature of cancer and its effects on individuals.
The film’s visuals, such as cells swimming in water and a growth resembling a tumor on the Lighthouse, further reinforce the cancer metaphor. By using these visual metaphors, Garland underscores the idea that cancer is not a singular concept but a multifaceted and evolving phenomenon.
A Thought-Provoking Experience
“Annihilation” stands out as a piece of art that challenges viewers and encourages them to reflect on its deeper meanings. By skillfully weaving the metaphor of cancer into its narrative, the film raises questions about life, mortality, and the impact of disease on individuals and the world.
While “Annihilation” may not provide clear-cut answers or satisfy those seeking clarity and normalcy, it serves as a testament to the power of art to provoke thought, evoke emotion, and inspire contemplation.