Twitter’s legal battle against Elon Musk has at least the merit of revealing some clear information about what actually happened behind the scenes, away from the cameras. The Deep Reasons Elon Musk Really Wanted to Buy Twitter Before Doing so machine the rear is still a bit vague – the epilogue of this judicial component (probably at the end of October) should give rise to real clarifications in this area. But already during the hearings, the lawyers of both sides provide an exchange of views with fascinating content. We owe the latest exposure to Twitter lawyers. Months before the entrepreneur began to show signs that he was going to derail the takeover, Elon Musk on May 8 would have asked son advising Morgan Stanley to “move slower” over its $44 billion takeover of Twitter. A note directly related to invasion Russians in Ukraine have just begun. Then the entrepreneur backed up his remark with a quote from Vladimir Putin’s speech, which he was supposed to deliver on May 9 and which he was able to read in advance.
Is the fear of World War III the real reason for the failed Twitter takeover?
In this speech, the Russian president was supposed to explain that the decision to invade Ukraine in February was “the only right decision”, while declaring that the West was “preparing to invade Russia.” Elon Musk explains in the rest of the exchange: “Let’s just slow down for a few days. […] Putin’s speech tomorrow is really important. It doesn’t make much sense to buy Twitter if on to World War III. A few weeks later, in July, the contractor officially announced son intention to cancel the repurchase agreement. Statement of controversy over the number of accounts associated with spam. Twitter lawyers are also presenting the revelations of former Twitter CEO Peter Zatko, whom the defense cites to better denigrate Twitter’s internet strategy, as a kind of plan B in case the argument about too high a share of bogus accounts doesn’t work. However, we note that Peter Zatko’s statements do seem to violate the network’s line of defense. socialwho thus prefers to attack the form rather than the content of the testimony – presumably so as not to weaken his position. The former executive did confirm under oath before Congress that Twitter had inadequately managed certain aspects of the security of its data on several occasions. See also – Who is Peter Zatko, the hacker who was able to disable Twitter? This could potentially discredit part of the prosecution’s case. One of Elon Musk’s lawyers reacted sharply to the publication of a private conversation between the entrepreneur and son banker, to better show that the quote is incomplete and misleading: “the presentation of this statement is absolutely meaningless, as the full transcript of the conversation shows,” the lawyer argues.